Thursday, November 6, 2008

W.







THEIRS: HIS and HERS went to see W. with some friends after dinner.


HERS:


W. What was he thinking half the time?

W. Why did so many people follow him?

W. Who elected this man a second time?

W. Why did Condolezza's character make her look SO bad?

W. Why was I supposed to have empathy for him after I saw this? I didn't.

The last scene summed it up. He looked lost. There was one scene I thought was brilliant. W. was leading a group of intelligent people on his ranch. They were having an important conversation, then W. realized they had missed the road and they were lost. The blind leading the blind. The message intended by the director was not lost on me.

W. What did I think of the movie? I don't really have an answer. It was a perspective worth seeing. I fear it was truer to tale than I would like to believe. I hope it was more fictional.

Lastly, I was finally attracted to W.! Well, I guess I was attracted to Josh Brolin playing a young W. That makes more sense...

HER RATING: 5, I guess.

HIS: W. was a movie that held my interest and got me thinking about how things have been done in our government over the past few years. The movie really got me thinking about the relationship between W. and H.W. and what the pressure must be like to live up to completely unrealistic expectations of your parent; and, what it must feel like to be the sheep of the family, no matter how much you try. Acting in this one was first-rate; my favorites were Richard Dreyfuss and Josh Brolin - his portrayal of W. was extraordinary. Mannerisms, body language, he had it all down.

I know Oliver Stone's movies drip with controversy, opinion, and sensationalism. But, knowing that doesn't take the fun out of seeing them :). Definitely a movie that's worth seeing for anyone interested in this time in history.

HIS RATING: Solid 8 of 10. W. will have you leaving the theater looking at things just a bit differently than before......

Zack and Miri Make a Porno


THEIRS: We went to see a Kevin Smith movie together for a date. NOTE: HIS and HERS do not read each other's bog before Posting.


HERS: OK, look. I was told it was Kevin Smith's best movie since Chasing Amy. While Clerks, Chasing Amy it was not, it was entertaining. There were some laugh out loud moments and a gross out moment that didn't look real, but was gross. There was the subject matter which I find entertaining in this format. "It was really a love story." Really? There was a lot of porn scenes. I guess those two things could go together. I found the love scene between the two characters so much better than the "other" scenes. It was laughable however, the cheesiness was not lost on me.


Hmmmmm. I really didn't believe the two characters together. They had great chemistry, but it really read friend chemistry. Some of the timing and high school reunion scenes were the best part of the film. Irony. Something Kevin Smith does well. But, again, it was no Chasing Amy.


HER RATING: 6- a good rental


HIS: I've been a Kevin Smith fan for some time. I had heard this was a light-hearted movie, kind of like "Chasing Amy" with a bit more of a risque' theme. Don't believe the title's hype - this movie, in some parts, was even a nice little story about two people figuring out that they have fallen for each other. The sensationalism of the title doesn't change that.


That being said, that process could have been done better. I think Seth Rogen is naturally pretty funny, and would have liked to have more for him to work with. Elizabeth Banks did a decent job - however I think this movie and her role in W. are definitely as far apart as two roles in film can get.


Maybe I've outgrown Kevin Smith movies. I'll have to pop "Clerks" in and see......



HIS RATING: 6.0 on a 10 point scale. Kevin Smith has done vulgar humor much better in the past.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist


THEIRS: Went to see this film with a few friends on a Friday night after dinner.

NOTE: HIS and HERS do not read each other's blogs before posting.


HERS: This movie was fresh, funny, sweet, rockin' and smart. The soundtrack was spectacular. Michael Cera (from Juno fame) and Kat Dennings (who plays the "uglier" one of the pretty girls--always the brunette I might add) were fabulous. Kat Dennings captivates with ease. She is stunning to watch and is going to be a HUGE star... Michael Cera is awkward in a way you can fall in love with, not much differently than in his Juno performance.


This was a "teen movie" with gross out humor, sex, scandal, one liners, love triangles, drunk chicks, understated fashion, a underground band and a defining soundtrack. With all that said, it was a movie for all ages. A love story that has a balance of heart and the rhythm of relationships. I LOVED it and can't wait to re-watch it.


HER RATING: 9.5 Watch out world, here comes Kat Dennings.


HIS: What a pleasant surprise. I've watched a lot of teen movies. This makes sense, because I was a teenager at one point. Many times I've asked myself, "are the ones I see now as good as the ones I grew up with?"


Over 90% of the time, the answer is a resounding no.


This is not one of those times. I really liked this story. The movie is shot in NYC, which I love, and there are great characters, a well done story, and even though no one in the film seems to have a curfew, and can get into very trendy bars being severely underage, I feel like this story could happen. That these kids exist somewhere. That's interesting to me. I pulled for Nick to gain the confidence in himself you could see was brimming beneath the surface.


The two main actors had such great natural chemistry. You could easily believe those were two real people, just hanging out, talking about music. Oh, and the music was really good too. Having never heard any of it before, it got me thinking of how much music out there I still need to listen to......


HIS RATING: Solid 9 of 10 on the teen-movie scale. Solid 8 of 10 on the "traditional" movie scale.

Friday, August 22, 2008

Vicky, Christina, Barcelona


THEIRS: Ahhhh, comp time. HIS took comp time and HERS had her normal Friday off, so they decided to take in a flick...baby free.
NOTE: HIS AND HERS DON'T READ EACH OTHER'S BLOG BEFORE POSTING.
.
HERS: The thing about this movie is, it had fabulous characters. So fabulous in fact that the most unique character, Christina, reminds me VERY MUCH, VERY, VERY MUCH of someone I know quite well. So, I laughed often at the similarities. Scarlett Johanson knocked this role out of the bed. I related to Vicky, Christina's best friend. Not the infidelity part, but a lot of her thought processes. Who can't relate to internal conflict? I am responsible, but I have urges to be irresponsible. Now, I am not saying I am running off to Spain, but I understand the want to fill the missing pieces of our lives and wanting to pull yourself out of the box others or yourself put you in. I know who I am but I search to find myself. A common conflict if you continue to grow and evolve as a person. OK, back to the flick...Javier Bardem is a scrumptious in this role of a man who speaks his mind and doesn't apologize for it-he is charming as well. Penelope Cruz is psychotically loving as the crazy ex. She was a unique character too, but I have met many Maria Elena's in my time. It was a good movie because it spoke to some of the most important driving forces in our lives, love, friendship, being true to yourself and making your life your own.It is a conversation film. I enjoyed it in ways I am still realizing 8 hours later.

Woody Allen make a movie about infidelity and love you wouldn't expect to find? Hmmm....direct what you know.

HER RATING: 8.5 This is a hard film to rate for me, the rating just doesn't pop out. It was interesting to watch and promoted a lot of thought and discussion. The performances were great and I if I could look like any star, I'd go with Scarlett Johanson. She is stunning in the role and on film. Does that make me bi-sexual? You have to watch the movie to get that question. LOL.



HIS: This is a Woody Allen movie. Woody Allen puts a lot of relationship-stuff in his movies. At least, the ones I've seen. I thought this was an "OK" movie with an A-list cast. Javier Bardem is on a roll, having won the Oscar for No Country for Old Men. He does a good job here, playing a guy with one thing on his mind - many different women. Scarlett Johanson does a good job as well playing a very free spirit - her character reminded me of someone I know in many ways. Penelope Cruz did a great job playing an unhinged woman that was very passionate and creative. I am convinced she can act; I wasn't sure after seeing the movie Sahara a few years ago. This movie had some subject matter that I didn't dig, but that doesn't mean I the movie wasn't done well. Spain is definitely beautiful; I definitely want to take my wife there someday. The movie was a story that held my interest because the characters seemed to be dealing with so many issues. That being said, Mamma Mia was a love story that I enjoyed much, much more. Maybe if Penelope Cruz broke out in "Waterloo," I may have liked the film more. That being said, I got to spend the day with my wife, and that was definitely the highlight of my day, even if the movie was so-so.

HIS RATING: 5 of 10 - This is a movie that you rent with a really good take-out meal, like olive garden, or the best pizza in town.

SPECIAL FEATURE! AFTER THE BLOG: THE CONVERSATION

HERS: After reading the blogs...more conversation ensued...worth seeing just for that...well, says HERS. HIS might say don't see it, avoid those deep conversations, just take your lady to a light chick flick that leaves her walking away with a pep in her step.The back and forth follows...

HIS: It is no secret I am more black and white about relationships. You saw things I didn't choose to see because the infidelity made his character difficult to empathize with.

HERS: When was HE an infidel?

HIS: Promiscuity, that is what made his character difficult to empathize with.

HERS: I just saw a man with a deeper want to love and being unable to get all the things he wanted in one person.
.
HIS: That is one way of looking at it, the other way of looking at it is he is a guy who wants lots of trim.

HERS: LOL! Ahhhhh, the differences that make the world go round. Agree to differ?

HIS: Agreed.

HERS: I also agree you can take me to Spain someday :).

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Mamma Mia!


THEIRS: The mother in law was in town, so HIS and HERS joined some friends for a movie. It was a busy week and they were ready for a break. Note: HIS and HERS do not read each other's blogs before posting.
HERS: I was not in the mood to do anything but sit. However, a babysitter was available for FREE and we had plans to meet friends. So, with exhaustion and my stomach aching, I went ahead and went to the movie...

It was SO worth it. I was singing full voiced, swinging my arms and hands around and just enjoying a musical with fabulous acting and a beautiful scenic backdrop. Now I know what I had previously just suspected. Meryl Streep CAN do anything. She was perfect in this role and when she sang, her acting came through and I was lost in the moment. Meryl Streep. Enough said.

Amanda Seyfried

I was fixed on the eyes, smile and performance of Amanda Seyfried as well. She was beautiful, captivating and just lovely in this performance. I knew her previously as Lilly Kane on Veronica Mars season 1 and as a Mean Girl whose breasts could predict the weather on Mean Girls. She was apparently fired from a soap opera before hitting the big screen on Mean Girls. GOOD. She is too fabulous of an actress and presence on the screen to be stuck in soaps. The soaps gave us Meg Ryan, Denzel Washington and NOW, Amanda Seyfried.

I laughed loud and often, especially when Pierce Brosnan sang. He was really committed...It was just very white manish? I don't know. Like I said he was really in the role, and the voice was reminiscent of 80's pop rock--I think. Either way, he made me smile and laugh, maybe at him, maybe with him. The supporting cast was beyond fantastic and each added so much to the film. The fantasy musical numbers were hilarious and fun, fun, fun!

HER RATING: 9.5 I love musicals, Meryl Streep and I have a new found enthusiasm for Amanda Seyfried! I recommend seeing it. Have fun, loose yourself in the fantasy and just smile!


HIS: I have a bit of background with ABBA. My dad used to play their greatest hits every time we took a long road trip or moved across the country (which was more than a few times). My wife started the tradition anew because she enjoyed the peppy Swedish super group as well. I find the songs catchy, and it's impossible to be in a bad mood when you hear them.

MAMMA MIA! is like that. After watching that movie, it was impossible to be in a bad mood. Definitely an entertaining flick. All the actors went for the singing numbers (even the ones that had NO business trying to bust out a tune - Pierce Brosnan, this means you). I was very pleasantly surprised by the young main actress in the movie (which I only know as a dead character in a show I used to watch). She had pipes to spare, and stole every song she sang.

Meryl Streep. The woman can do no wrong in film. She can be in the sequel to Stop, or My Mom Will Shoot and it would get nominated for an Oscar. She needs to be in at least one film a year of varying genres so my wife and I can enjoy her talent regularly. Great job, particularly in the musical numbers with her two "partners in crime." When my wife buys this movie, I'll be happy to give it a whirl again.

HIS RATING: On a musical movie scale: Solid 8.5 out of 10. Regular movie scale: Solid 8 out of 10. Great movie to see after a long week at work and a great way to kick off a 3-day weekend!

Sunday, July 27, 2008

The Dark Knight


THEIRS: HIS and HERS had a date night, HIS being the comic book fan that he is was dying to see The Dark Knight. HERS liked the last Batman, so off they went.
Note: HIS and HERS do not read each other's blogs before posting.

HERS: What can I say? The movie was preceded by so much hype, record breaking and buzz, my expectations were high. Often, when my expectations are high, I am disappointed. This time...SPEC-BAT-TACULAR! Christian Bale is so the Batman of my dreams. No offense to George Clooney, but he bit bat dust. Michael Keaton... too scrawny to be believable. Christian Bale is brooding and mysterious. He plays the privileged playboy to the tee and then, when the bat suit comes on, TA-DAH. Batman baby! My one note is that his "Bat voice" didn't need to be sooooo brooding. Maggie Gyllenhall was the perfect Rachel Dawes. She may not have the traditional movie star looks of Katie Holmes, but she is stunning in the role. She is believable as the tough girl with a heart. Her performance was stellar. The late Heath Ledger brought down the house of cards as the Joker. He was funny in the creepiest possible way. He was outstandingly ghoulish and so evil that I loved to hate him. OK, so I loved him-no hate included- I guess those teenage years of going for the bad boy are still deep inside me. Anyway, back to the movie. I must say that sadness came over me a few times as I thought of Heath Ledger's daughter growing up without a father. Father being the most important role he will not be able to reprise.

Having never read a comic book, I just go by what I like. The movie "bat"ter than I had imagined. I often dread long movies, but the time flew by-bat style. When his batmobile was totalled and he came out on that bat motorcycle thingy (I am sure it has some graphic novel techie name) I was like, "That's what's up!" I guess there is some teenage boy in me too. (yes, I think I met my bat reference quotient.) :)

HER RATING: 8.5 The acting was superb, it was just dark enough and had fabulous special effects. Christian Bale-the best Batman, Maggie Gyllenhall-the best Rachel Dawes, the late Heath Ledger-WAS the Joker. See it. Rest in Peace Heath.


HIS: This movie has definitely come with a lot of hype and press for quite a few reasons. I was very happy to see and judge the film for myself last night.

And it did not disappoint.

The Dark Knight takes everything that was great about Batman Begins, and ramps it up a notch. Because you care about what happens to the characters, every event seems more serious. You really feel for these characters and the decisions they have to make. I haven't seen this much dread in a PG-13 movie. Everyone talks about Heath Ledger's performance. It is that good - he becomes something that is indescribable. Christian Bale continues to embody the balance between Batman and Bruce Wayne perfectly - and you believe both sides of his personality equally. Gary Oldman continues to put forth great work in the unsung role of Jim Gordon. Maggie Gyllenhall is a serious upgrade to the Rachel Dawes character - you believe she's an adult, and that she could also be an assistant D.A. Aaron Eckhart is great as Harvey Dent, brash, fearless, and then towards the end of the film his fall from grace is as epic as you can get. Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman are old pros, and their work is stellar here as always.

In short, this was not a "comic book" story - it was an epic crime drama. As great as Iron Man was earlier this year, The Dark Knight is definitely the best movie I've seen of this genre. This is one of the ten best movies I've seen since I started watching movies.

HIS RATING: 10 of 10. Amazing performance, airtight, riveting story, and I can honestly say I have NO IDEA what's going to happen next. Last time I said that? The Empire Strikes Back in 1980. I'm very curious to see how this story ends......

Sunday, July 13, 2008

Blue Man Group-Tubes


THEIRS: It was THEIR 11 year wedding anniversary and they thought they would try something new. They went to see The Blue Man Group-Tubes, in Boston.

NOTE: THEY DON'T READ EACH OTHER'S BLOGS BEFORE POSTING.

HERS: What was that? Three blue men, toilet paper, improv, hand held camera, Twinkies Light, Captain Crunch, crowd participation, TV screens, silliness, percussion, head bobbing, head bands, a band, male adolescent gross out humor. Did I mention toilet paper? There you go. I am sure you have a complete picture now, right? Exactly! Interesting. A new experience.

HER RATING: 7.5 It was enjoyable, I think... and I loved the toilet paper rave-like experience at the end. I would recommend it if you were open to new experiences and are a crowd participation type of person... I am, I loved that part! Did I mention toilet paper?

HIS: There was toilet paper hanging from nearly every corner of the theater. I thought to myself, "this is interesting." I had no idea how that toilet paper would play a crucial role in the climax of the show. First off, the playhouse was tucked away in a corner of the city. Even though I thought the seats were far away, we had quite a good vantage point.

Then, the blue guys came out. Very interesting gents.

We were treated to a performance that involved cool drum beats, splotches of paint, and audience interaction. Oh, and lots and lots of Twinkie goo. LOTS of Twinkie goo. The audience participants were good sports, and everyone seemed to have a good time. Oh, but the previously mentioned toilet paper - I almost forgot! At one of the last points of the show we got to unroll all the paper and throw it around the entire theater. If you can't see the fun in what I just described, you must try it. Absolute, kid-like euphoria.

All in all, I think the show was just another example of how art can take many forms. That, and the reality that three guys painted blue can draw a crowd.

HIS RATING: Blue Man Group - 7 of 10. Toilet paper fun - 10 of 10. Definitely an anniversary for the books......

Friday, July 11, 2008

Plaza III

THEIRS: HIS and HERS went to a steakhouse for dinner, recommended by the concierge in Boston's North end.

HIS and HERS do not read each other's blog before posting.


HERS: The food was FABULOUS. First, we were served raw veggies with ranch in an ice bucket, second came the best bread I have ever had along with some butter. I was looking forward to a nice dinner, so I ordered a dinner salad that came with cheese, croutons and bacon...I know, right? YUM. Then the Filet Mignon and white cheddar potatoes were next. The steak was cooked perfectly and melted in my mouth. The potatoes were good, but I didn't eat many because I had to save room for dessert. I had a few bites of HIS hash browns and a bite of HIS steak...it was VERY flavorful. Nothing was bad...until the chocolate souffle'. It wasn't chocolaty enough and was an oatmeal like consistency (and I don't like oatmeal)...but with many more calories I am sure (except our tour guide earlier in the day said there were no calories on vacation...uh, she's the expert).
The service was beyond brilliant. Michael was our server. Gave us good recommendations and was very funny and did some great Boston accents for us. He had HIM laughing out loud and I was in stitches. He forgot to bring the accompaniments that were to come with the souffle! The whip cream and chocolate sauce came...tasted much better then! Souffle' still not so great. Michael however, was forgiven. He is 20 years old, studying criminal justice/pre-law after doing a year in Navy ROTC. He had tons of personality and humor. He was a great server, his life reminded me of HIS past and I felt a great connection with his jokes, sarcasm and accents! OK, so Michael was the cherry on top. I think I would have adopted him if I could have. Brilliant young man. I am sure he will figure out his life's path. His personality will fit whatever he decides. OH, and his grandparents are MSU grad and his father from Grand Rapids, MI and his Mom from Chicago.

HER RATING: 8.5 Would have easily been a 9 or even 10 if the dessert had delivered. The food was YUMMO. The location was in Faneuil Hall we sat at the open window, right outside with loads of people watching. Michael's personality and service delivered! I would go back for a special occasion. Pricey-with a $124 tag. Similar to other ala cart steak houses in the area.

HIS: This restaurant was awesome. Every part of the meal was a high point. Salad had that good, creamy ranch. Bread was superb - and everyone knows that good meals have good bread. The sides were both good for different reasons - hash brown were buttery, crunchy, and very tasty; the white cheddar potatoes were a lot better than I thought they would be. Upon the waiter's suggestion, I had the Kansas City Strip Steak.

Wow.
That was unexpected. Great flippin steak. The least spectacular part of the meal was the dessert - and it was decent, but only after the waiter brought some chocolate sauce and cream. The cookie I had the day before was a heck of a lot better. And the waiter was absolutely hilarious, and his great service made the experience that much better.


Best part of the meal was spending it with my wife, celebrating our amazing life together. No matter how much time passes, I still get the same exhilarating feelings when we're doing things together. We capped off our meal with a seat at the harbor, watching the boats and the water. Great way to finish off our meal. This is a cool town - we'll definitely be back again.

HIS RATING: Plaza III - 9 of 10 (great desert would have made it a perfect score). Oh, and my wife looked really hot, which is always a plus :).

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Joe's




THEIRS: HIS and HERS are in Boston for their 11 year Anniversary. They got off the plane, to their hotel and were starved. They saw, out Their window "JOE'S".

NOTE: HIS AND HERS DO NOT SEE EACH OTHER'S BLOGS BEFORE POSTING.

HERS: Joe's. Simple name. Simple food. FABULOUS location. My first impression was great. It was clean, close to the hotel and beautifully placed on the Boston Wharf. I was starving and saw a lot of things that sounded good on the menu. I was so hungry that the bread that came before the meal was gone in moments. Served warm with butter. It was mouth wateringly fabulous-a little crunch on the outside and warm and soft on the inside. I ordered a chicken club sandwich accompanied with some fries and two onion rings for garnish. It was light, and yummy. I knew we would be doing some walking, so I didn't want to eat much. I was jealous of Wayne's food when it came. He gave me a bite of each thing on his plate and it was scrumptious. I would go back! My fries were a little to heavy with grease, but the onion rings and chicken club on wheat was light and tasty-not eating but a few fries saved me some calories for later! Right?

HER RATING: 7.5 Good food, decent prices for the touristy location and the service was friendly, but could have been more attentive. The location was perfect with the breeze off the water blowing through my hair. $40 for the two of us.

HIS: Stepping out of the taxi, I felt a rush of zen-like relaxation. I had one thought, "Man, this town is very cool." Our hotel is in a RIDICULOUS location - everything I could ask for, and some things I didn't think to ask for, are within walking distance. The harbor is great - boats of all varieties (all expensive of course). I had some great cod at JOE's, with a slammin' rice pilaf and fresh vegetables. Aside from the server that had just come from the beach and acted as if she was still there, the meal was a great start to the trip. The thing is, I didn't even care that the service wasn't great, because this place is super-relaxing. I just took my Dramamine and am ready for the Sunset Cruise.

This place is going to be fun.

HIS RATING: 8, Joe's restaurant: Food - solid 9 - service was a solid 4. Boston First Impression: what a great town. Rating of my traveling companion: Off The Charts.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Hancock

THEIRS: Wayne and Jaimie went to the movie with their out of state guests, Nick from Colorado and John and Michelle from California. All Will Smith fans.

NOTE: HIS and HERS do not read each other's blogs before posting.

HERS: Will Smith played Hancock, a flawed super hero. Sounds good to me! Will Smith was engaging and charming as always. He is a good actor, he played a drunk superhero. I believed him. That says something! Charlize Theron, she is just a gorgeous thing isn't she? She did not gain weight or take off the makeup for this one. She reminded me how fabulous she looks. Aside from looks, it wasn't a meaty part and she was outshined. Contrastingly, she was captivating to watch at the same time. Jason Bateman is really making a comeback (I loved him in Silver Spoons)! In Juno, he played a soul searching wanna be father/rock star and in Hancock he plays a public relations representative with a sense of purpose to do something good in the world. He is back! He was perfect for the role and was the glue that held the movie together.

The best scenes in the movie were the flawed attempts to "do good" that turned Hancock into a despised superhero. The scenes were really funny and visually well done. It looked believable. I know, believable? A super hero movie. . . well, the big twist lost me a bit. When there was another superhero in the movie, I just found it to be unbelievable. I was all for the flawed superhero Hancock. But then in there was ANOTHER "one" of a kind superhero. Not to mention she was Hancock's long lost love who he didn't remember due to amnesia...come on. How can a SUPERHERO have amnesia? He could fly! He could lift heavy objects and repel bullets! BUT, he couldn't remember-BOO.

HER RATING: 6.5 Overall, Will entertained me, I was endeared to Jason and Charlize looked better than ever. I was entertained, but the second half of the movie left me wanting more humor and less "if you love them, let them go "cliche' resolve. Recommendation: Rent it-there are some laughs-and WILL SMITH of course!

HIS: Will Smith owns the 4th of July. Everyone knows this. He was in a movie some time ago called Wild Wild West (a remake with Kevin Kline). This was a ridiculous movie, with very few high notes, and it made over 100 million dollars (a big deal back then). Truthfully, Will Smith is one of my favorite actors to watch on the screen. Very likable - definitely someone you could hang at a barbecue with. I've also been increasingly impressed with the roles he's taken outside his comfort zone (the Pursuit of Happyness was great on the strength of his performance, period). He's shown more layers as a performer than I ever expected.

Unfortunately, that also means that I judge him by a higher standard now than I used to, because I know what he can do. When good actors are in bad movies, they stand out. Big Willie stands out in this movie. Now, don't get me wrong, Hancock is not a bad movie, it's just a good idea that did not become a good movie. It tried to be several things throughout it's running time (man versus himself conflict, unrequited love story, comedy with a small bit of drama, etc.), and it never did any of them well. The best idea was that of a superhero that felt completely alone, and to cope, he shut himself off from the world, drinking more than an MSU student after a football game, not caring about what anyone thought of him. However, this idea goes away well before it's fully resolved, leaving Hancock to: 1. decide whether or not he's in love with someone in the film, and 2. deal with a criminal who is mortal, missing a hand, and can't carry his jockstrap if they ever had to scrap toe to toe. All of these situations are not handled well.

I love superhero movies. Will Smith could be a great superhero. Unfortunately, this isn't the movie that did that for me. But, it was not nearly as ridiculous as The Happening.

HIS RATING: solid 6 of 10 - Will Smith doesn't do anything in this film to make us dislike him. Rent it - it will definitely make you laugh in spots. The scene with the whale is hilarious.

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

The Happening


THEIRS: Wayne's Mother watched our daughter for a week while the daycare was closed. As a "thanks!" we decided to take her to dinner and a movie. It was Jaimie's mom's birthday too, so we brought her as well. We went on a "date" with our moms and let Wayne's Mom pick the movie, Wayne agreed with the choice and Jaimie liked The Village, The Sixth Sense and Signs all by M. Night Shyamalan...so why not.

NOTE: HIS AND HERS DO NOT READ EACH OTHER'S BLOGS BEFORE PUBLISHING.

HERS: Why not? What was I thinking? I hadn't even heard of this movie. Let me sum it up by saying, "it sucked." This was like a horrible B movie from some earlier decade. I hate scary movies that are realistic, so I was worried I would be scared, but went anyway. No problems there! I was so bored that right during a "horror" scene, I turned to my husband and said, "so who was in the funky bunch?" That is right, I was thinking about Mark Wahlberg (AKA Marky Mark, of Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch "fame"), the "star" of this flick and I didn't care if he lived or died. The acting was so bad, I was bummed he wasn't offed. I thought of his undie add in times square, I thought about the fact that I liked him in other movies, I contemplated how much he was paid for this movie. My mind wandered. The movie did not keep my interest, to say the least. If it was meant to be a spoof, it still sucked. If it was meant to be a homage, it still sucked. If it was meant to be horror, suspense, etc., It still sucked. I laughed when I should have been scared. There were a few, a very few, interesting scenes of how people offed themselves. A decent "how to kill yourself in an interesting way" movie at best. When the "big reveal" was made, it was made too early and was not shrouded in any mystery. Some kook said, "I think it was the plants." There you have it. The plants had people kill themselves because "as a people" we are horrible to the environment. I am not making this up. I am all for going green...but make it interesting. I would not recommend wasting your time, scratch that- rent it just so you can see how bad it was.

HER RATING: 3 Mark Wahlberg wasn't bad to look at...that's all I've got.

HIS: Before I say anything about this movie, I have to take accountability for suggesting it to my family. M. Night has made some questionable choices before, but the preview for this film hinted a return to form, and Mark Wahlberg is on a streak of good, watchable movies (very good in the Departed). So, the bamboozledness I feel is almost entirely my doing (my mom also voted for this film, but her movie opinion is jaded by a few other factors that we won't discuss here....).

I thought we might be in trouble when the credits came up, and there was this strange music, with clouds rolling by very quickly, as if the sky was on "fast forward." It reeked of a lack of class or polish, and I felt like I was watching one of those bad introductions to a horror movie on Cinemax or The Movie Channel.

It got worse from there. Every ten minutes, something happened that was less interesting than what preceded it. When people died, I didn't care. When I was supposed to feel impending doom or dread, I found myself wishing I had more Raisinets. This was the worst movie I've seen in a long time, and in my opinion, one of the two worst movies I've ever suggested to my wife in the almost fourteen years we've been together (the other will remain in infamy). I wish the plants in the film would have just sprouted faces and said "don't screw with us." At least that would have been interesting.

I need a good movie to help erase this feeling. Hancock tried to help, but in spite of the power of Will Smith, didn't deliver. I hope everything I've heard about The Dark Knight is true. That's what it will take to erase the feeling of The Happening.

HIS RATING: 1 Because I can't give it a lower rating, 1 of 10. Mark Wahlberg should insert himself into at least a few episodes of Entourage to make up for this crap. Oh, and start shooting the Brazilian Job ASAP.

The Couple That Blogs Together...


Note: HIS and HERS do not read each other's blog before they post.

HERS: I want to do a blog together, yes together. We share so many things in life together, why not blog. We have opinions that differ and some that are the same...so let's put pen to paper and let our public (whoever they are) decide who's right, ahem, I mean who they agree with.

HIS: My wife and I do a lot of things together. Movies, play games, you name it, we've either done it or thought it might be fun to do in the future. As I write this, we've talked about trying a ballroom dance class for at least the past six years. You know what else we've been talking about for six years? Writing a blog about our opinions on movies, music, and other art that enriches and entertains us. Now that it is "live," I hope that it is as fun to read as the experiences that we write about.